Tag Archives: value systems

When China Sneezes, the Global Economy Goes to the Hospital


This is a story about China’s centrally planned Too-Big-To-Fail economy and the impact that has on our future

When I was in business school, there used to be a saying that pointed to the strength of the US economy that went something like this: When the US sneezes the world catches a cold. A lot has changed since and China has become the driver of much of what happens in the global economy today. This is all due to a very odd mix of a centrally planned economy (what we in Spiral Dynamic call the Blue-Absolutistic value system of governance) with a mix of strategic and highly manipulative objectives to take over the world (Orange in Spiral Dynamics), while using Red/Purple values and tactics (oppression and tribal manipulation) to employ slave labor and engage in other subversive practices. This rare form of governance has allowed China to bully the third world and control its resources and undermine intellectual copyrights and global trade covenants. It has condoned the abuse of human rights at home while enriching the few elite members of the Communist Party of China (the CCP). The Western world has overlooked all this as it continues to feed its insatiable appetite for endless consumption and focusing on cheap production costs while increasing the profit margins of big Western corporations on the back of cheap Chinese labor.

In order for any true free-market economy to succeed, Blue central planning must remain a transitory phase that builds the physical economic infrastructure (highways and ports as well as robust institutions) then it must be relegated to maintenance and support as Blue responsibilities become those of a government responding to Orange innovation and its effective regulation. This is not the case with China, as it continued building cities that have remained empty for years through its absolutistic Blue leadership. Click on this link to an interview I gave to Newsweek Magazine a while ago which warns against China’s sudden transition from Blue to Orange.

Blue/Red men in Orange suits

Well, like any other closed Blue system of governance run by closed system ideologues, China remains unaccepting of ideas on how to give up control without having to instate major reforms that threaten the very existence of its brave experiment. Cracks in the system are beginning to show as the transitory Blue economic policies have been exhausted beyond their useful function. These are signs of the deeper tectonic plates the plague the Chinese economy. The canary in the coalmine is its real estate sector with 100’s of development companies teetering on the edge of collapse as they owe 100s of Billions to Chinese banks. The first hint of the forthcoming collapse of this sector recently came from property development giant Evergrande, warning that it might not be able to meet its debt payments to its lenders. The news sent shockwaves through global financial markets as analysts began to speculate as to what this could mean. Evergrande in the largest real estate development firm in the world and holds a world record of $300 Billion in debt; a sum that is larger than most counties’ annual sovereign debt. As the Chinese Communist Party tries to grapple with these upcoming existential economic crises, there could only be one of two outcomes:

  1. Stop the blind drive-at-any-cost to become #1 and transition to a free market economy. This will necessitate the long-awaited upward movement in governance and values to an entirely different set of metrics, which will bring the long awaited, market-driven price discoveryto a $16 Trillion a year economy that will now be based on market forces of supply and demand not the will of a few people in the National People’s Congress claiming to know what’s best for their people and the world while becoming Billionaires and rarely if ever being transparent.
  2. Continue with the Blue-centrally planned economy that blindly seeks becoming #1 while hiding much of the corruption and abuse that remains hidden from the eyes of the world.

If I were a betting man, I’ll put my money on the latter. This will likely be the path that the CCP will take while seeking to increase its geopoltical influence through its repressive Red-Blue policies. Change will not likely come anytime soon to China since it holds the biggest Ace in the hole that the West has chosen to ignore. Part of it’s hidden wealth is in a 200-year reserve of resources and raw material that it has accumulated from around the world over the last few decades. While the West was preoccupied with outsourcing everything, falsely believing that China shared their advanced Orange capitalist values such as improving stockholders’ bottom line, the endless pursuit of lean manufacturing and the inexhaustible obsession with the global supply chain, China was focusing on how to exploit this Western naiveté for its long-term strategic advantage.

Once the West wakes up to China’s drive to create a global resource monopoly, they will be forced to reassess their ill-thought preception of global trade and begin to focus on resources as a national security matter. This is the new geopolitical divide the awaits the world: China and resource-rich third world counties on one side, the West and its allies on the other. In my work, I call this the New Global Axis of Values: Red/Blue v Orange/Green. Click here for a full explanation of what these values stand for. My long-term bet is on the West since it has long been established in the values of the Orange system which has the mandate to uncover the secrets of the universe through scientific discoveries, quantitative analysis and research and development.

We in the West must reinvent ourselves as the undisputed global leaders in research and development in energy and in new sustainable, carbon-neutral resources , especially when the alternative is China’s carbon-heavy pile of natural resources that will surely continue to destabalize life on our planet.

Like!
2

Is Democracy Destined to Fail, or is it Exiting its Adolescent Stages?

Recent scientific surveys conducted by Dr. Bjarni Jonsson reveal that almost 97% of people around the world believe that Democracy is a good way to govern. The same survey also revealed that almost 80% of people worldwide seem to have a deep mistrust in the system and its philosophy. This figure is likely at an all-time high and is not expected to moderate anytime soon.

What accounts for this discrepancy and does scientific research support the findings that Democracy is a failed experiment that needs to be replaced by a different system for governance. Would an alternative system need to be more authoritarian and restrictive, or would a deeper level of engagement and trust in Democracy help improve the virtues of governance. What if more of the world population and its leaders gain a better understanding of what needs to be done to guard the precious virtues of “government by the people?” What would be the mechanisms that need to be put in place to guarantee that all voices be heard?

Dr. Jonsson argues that Democracy as a fully functioning system for governance has not emerged yet, and what we call democracies is a big misunderstanding. He will be arguing his case for the different types of governance and what it will take for us to gain a better understanding of governing systems designed from the Emerging values of Humanity, what we in Spiral Dynamics call the values of the Second Tier.

Dr. Jonsson will present his views on these issues at the highly anticipated Spiral Dynamics Summit on the Future scheduled to take place in Dallas in April. Please click here for more details, and for a preview of the event. You can find out more about Dr. Jonsson and his work with the Icelandic National Assembly and the crucial role it played in reuniting Iceland after the devastating effects of the financial crisis of 2008. You can also look up Dr. Jonsson’s talks about “Crowd Visioning” on TEDx Stage.

“The primary focus of the Summit is to bring together the brightest global minds to help us better understand chaos and change in these times of uncertainty.”                                                                                

                                                                                                                    Dr. Don E. Beck

 

Like!
14

THE COLORFUL AND DYNAMIC PIECES OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL PIE

This post is in response to a simple question posed on social media regarding the definition of the Healthy expression of the Red value system. Like many questions of this general nature that were posed before, debates and opinions went on for days with responses as varied as each commentator’s personal experience with Red, or what appeared to be Red in their world. In the end, this was a highly engaging debate that allowed many members of the online Beck-Graves group to engage in conversation for the very first time. The purpose of this post is to offer some nuanced analysis, reminders and some possible tools that practitioners might take to their field of work or personal lives.

One of the very first things I caution people about at trainings and presentations is not to diminish the effectiveness of the theory by superficially placing labels like colors and levels on people or systems. This is how we diminish the merits of the developmental model and bring an end to any in depth analysis to a given situation. Instead of asking for an absolute description of a particular color or level that solicits so many varying answers, the question should always be: How does that developmental level show up in your daily life, acknowledging the dynamic nature of the framework.

People’s vMEMEs don’t exist in a vacuum as permanent psychological states or stages. They are complex profiles that can range from Purple to Turquoise in a span of a single day. While one or more value systems are active in us at any given time, the rest lay dormant waiting to be activated in response to environmental stimuli. Yes, Life Conditions the one important factor that was greatly overlooked in the online debate remains the essential element that makes the model operational. This is the other half of the ECLET/SD framework that determines a person’s resilience to respond and adapt effectively. It guides the upshift, the downshift and diagonal movement of the psychological health of an individual or a system.

It is important to understand that Red today, healthy or unhealthy is not a permanent stage even in people where the Bio/Neuro Triad of the theory (the hardware of the brain) is limited to the Red vMEME. We live in complex Life Conditions that are constantly bombarding our brain to the point that if it can’t create new hardware, it develops mirror neurons that can mimic higher value systems; a fake it till you make it type of assimilation. Additionally, what might look like healthy red to a Second Tier observer, might be viewed as extremely unhealthy Red to Blue or Green, or even a healthy version of Orange. What is important is to know when healthy Red is needed, and more importantly, where to direct its energy when its not. When we take these factors and place them into the non-theoretical complexity mentioned above, analysis becomes far more effective.

I often use this graphic in my presentations to illustrate the dynamic nature of how the different developmental levels may stack in a psychologically mature person on any given day when in different Life Conditions.

  • SPORTS EVENTS: DOMINANT: RED & PURPLE.
  • FAMILY: DOMINANT: PURPLE, BLUE & GREEN.
  • WORK AT LOCAL SMALL BUSINESS: BALANCED LOW DENSITY/COMPLEXITY ACROSS ENTIRE MEMEPLEX.
  • WORK IN  INDUSTRIAL ECONOMY: DOMINANT: ORANGE
  • WORK IN DIGITAL ECONOMY: DOMINANT W/HIGH DENSITY: GREEN & ORANGE
  • CONSERVATIVE POLITICS: DOMINANT: ORANGE & BLUE
  • LIBERAL POLITICS: DOMINANT: GREEN & BLUE

It’s important to keep in mind that these are hypothetical value systems compositions that are intended to convey the complexity of the entire vMEMEstack that changes whenever challenges from Life Conditions change.

So, when do we see a particular expression like healthy Red dominate? Well, it all depends on the situation. In the Western world today, Red bravery alone is rarely needed in a permanent way in leadership due to the existence of higher complexity. Should that higher complexity become toxic and resistant to emergence, the system will choose a Red leader to detoxify the blockages in the memestack. Unfortunately, Red’s best capacities are in undoing higher systems, or dominating lower systems. It cannot rebuild after the system is detoxified. That job is for higher systems. Which higher systems and what are their contents? That depends on those ever changing and often complex Life Conditions.

 

Like!
13